{"id":12208,"date":"2017-02-14T15:57:55","date_gmt":"2017-02-14T14:57:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/test\/?page_id=12208"},"modified":"2018-09-07T15:31:35","modified_gmt":"2018-09-07T13:31:35","slug":"workshop","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/workshop\/","title":{"rendered":"Workshop"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-1 nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling\" style=\"background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0);background-position: center center;background-repeat: no-repeat;padding-top:20px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:20px;padding-left:0px;margin-bottom: 0px;margin-top: 0px;border-width: 0px 0px 0px 0px;border-color:#eae9e9;border-style:solid;\" ><div class=\"fusion-builder-row fusion-row\"><div class=\"fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-0 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-one-full fusion-column-first fusion-column-last\" style=\"margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:20px;\"><div class=\"fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-column-wrapper-legacy\" style=\"background-position:left top;background-repeat:no-repeat;-webkit-background-size:cover;-moz-background-size:cover;-o-background-size:cover;background-size:cover;padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;\"><div class=\"fusion-text fusion-text-1\"><h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><em>Semantic maps:<\/em><\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> <strong><em>Where do we stand and where are we going?<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Li\u00e8ge, 26<sup>th<\/sup>-28<sup>th<\/sup> of June 2018<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Program<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/05\/Full-Program_LeDiasema.pdf\">Full Program<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/05\/Workshop_2018_LeDiasema_Talks.pdf\">Abstracts for Talks<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/05\/Workshop_2018_LeDiasema_Posters.pdf\">Abstracts for Posters<\/a><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>June 26\u00a0 \u2013 Salle des Professeurs (A1, 1st floor)<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">18:00 \u201319.30<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Public lecture by William Croft, <em>University of New Mexico<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cWhat an evolutionary model can tell us about mechanisms of language change\u201d<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>June 27 \u2013 Salle lumi\u00e8re (A1, 2nd floor)<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Johan van der Auwera, <em>University of Antwerp<\/em>: Discussant during the whole workshop<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">09:00 \u2013 09:15<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Jean Winand, <em>University of Li\u00e8ge<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Opening address <\/strong>(<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/09\/Winand_2018_LeDiasema.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download pdf of the lecture<\/a>)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">09:15 \u2013 09:30<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Thanasis Georgakopoulos &amp; St\u00e9phane Polis, <em>University of Li\u00e8ge &amp; F.R.S.-FNRS<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cThe semantic map model(s): An overview\u201d<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">09:30 \u2013 10:30<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">William Croft, <em>University of New Mexico<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cUsing quantitative methods for semantic maps\u201d <\/strong>(<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/09\/Croft_2018_LeDiasema.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download pdf of the lecture<\/a>)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">10.30 \u2013 11.00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u2013 <strong>Break<\/strong> \u2013<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">11:00 \u2013 12:00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Natalia Levshina, <em>Leipzig University<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cSemantic maps of causative constructions: Data types and methods in contrast\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>(<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/09\/Levshina_2018_LeDiasema.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download pdf of the lecture<\/a>)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">12:00 \u2013 13:00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Andrej Malchukov, <em>University of Mainz<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cSemantic maps, attractor networks and typological hierarchies\u201d <\/strong>(<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/09\/Malchukov_2018_LeDiasema.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download pdf of the lecture<\/a>)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">13.00 \u2013 14.30<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Lunch (Catering) and Poster session<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">14:30 \u2013 15:30<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Silvia Luraghi, <em>University of Pavia<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cIncorporating diachronic information in semantic maps: pros and cons\u201d <\/strong>(<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/09\/Luraghi_2018_LeDiasema.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download pdf of the lecture<\/a>)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">15:30 \u2013 16:30<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Alexandre Fran\u00e7ois, <em>Australian National University, Canberra<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cLexical travel maps: A spatial view of semantic change\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>(<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/09\/Fran\u00e7ois_2018_LeDiasema2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download pdf of the lecture<\/a>)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">16:30\u2013 17.00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u2013 <strong>Break<\/strong> \u2013<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">17.00\u2013 18:00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Johann Mattis List, <em>Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cCLICS 2.0: A computer-assisted framework for the investigation of lexical motivation patterns\u201d <\/strong>(<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/09\/List_2018_LeDiasema.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download pdf of the lecture<\/a>)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">18:00 \u2013 19:00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Wine reception\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>June 28 \u2013 Salle lumi\u00e8re (A1, 2nd floor)<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">09:00 \u2013 10:00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Ekaterina Rakhilina &amp; Daria Ryzhova, <em>National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Moscow<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cLexical semantic maps in the Moscow Lexical Typology Group\u201d<\/strong> (<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/09\/RakhilinaRyzhova_2018_LeDiasema.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download pdf of the lecture<\/a>)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">10:00 \u2013 11:00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm &amp; Volker Gast, <em>Stockholm University &amp; Friedrich Schiller University Jena<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cAreality in colexification patterns\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>(<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/09\/Koptjevskaja-TammGast_2018_LeDiasema.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download pdf of the lecture<\/a>)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">11:00 \u2013 11.30<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u2013 <strong>Break<\/strong> \u2013<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">11:30 \u2013 12.30<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Thanasis Georgakopoulos &amp; St\u00e9phane Polis, <em>University of Li\u00e8ge &amp; F.R.S.-FNRS<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cLExical DIAchronic SEmantic MAps (Le Diasema): From simple networks to mixed multi-edge graphs\u201d <\/strong>(<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/09\/GeorgakopoulosPolis_2018_LeDiasema.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download pdf of the lecture<\/a>)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">12:30 \u2013 13:30<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Martine Vanhove, <em>LLACAN (CNRS), INaLCO, USPC<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cA semantic map of the so-called \u201cOptative negative\u201d in Beja\u201d\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">13:30-15.00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Lunch<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">15:00 \u2013 16:00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Loic-Michel Perrin, <em>INaLCO (CNRS)<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cCultural representations and semantic connections: the model of temperature terms in French and Wolof\u201d\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">16:00 \u2013 17:00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Tatiana Nikitina,\u00a0<em>LLACAN (CNRS)<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cBuilding an amphichronic semantic map for closely related languages: Insights from Southeastern Mande\u201d <\/strong>(<a href=\"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/43\/2018\/09\/semantic_maps_Nikitina.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download pdf of the lecture<\/a>)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">17:00 \u2013 17.30<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Closing remarks\u00a0 \u00a0<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">19:00<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Workshop dinner<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Poster Session<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Sergey Bragin, Sergei Obiedkov, &amp; Daria Ryzhova (National Research University Higher School of Economics)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cFormal Concept Lattices as Semantic Maps\u201d<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Ga\u00eblle Chantrain (Charles University, Prague)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cMapping the \u2018unbounded time\u2019 domain in Ancient Egyptian: a diachronic approach\u201d<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Hajnalka Dim\u00e9ny (Babe\u0219\u2013Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cSome meticulous senses and the lessons drawn\u201d<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Diana Forker (Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cComparing semantic maps for the dative domain: Evidence from Nakh-Daghestanian\u201d<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Elena Karagjosova (Free University of Berlin)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cA diachronic semantic map of temporal, causal and conditional relations\u201d<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">So Miyagawa (University of G\u00f6ttingen and Kyoto University) &amp; Amir Zeldes (Georgetown University)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cA semantic map of the Coptic complementizer \u010de- based on corpus analysis: Grammaticalization and areal typology in Africa\u201d<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Natalia Perkova (Stockholm University)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cRevisiting semantic maps: the case of comitatives\u201d<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Anna Smirnitskaya (Institute of Oriental Studies, Moscow)<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201cThe Catalogue of semantic shifts as \u0430 way to represent semantic variability\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">&#8212;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Organizing Committee <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Philippe De Brabanter (Universit\u00e9 libre de Bruxelles)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Thanasis Georgakopoulos (University of Li\u00e8ge)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Kristel Van Goethem (Universit\u00e9 Catholique de Louvain &amp; F.R.S.-FNRS)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">St\u00e9phane Polis (University of Li\u00e8ge &amp; F.R.S.-FNRS)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Jean Winand (University of Li\u00e8ge)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Scientific Committee <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Johan van der Auwera (University of Antwerp)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">William Croft (University of New Mexico)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Alexandre Fran\u00e7ois (ANU, Canberra)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Eitan Grossman (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (Stockholm University)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">&#8212;<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Organizers: Thanasis Georgakopoulos (University of Li\u00e8ge); St\u00e9phane Polis (University of Li\u00e8ge\/ F.R.S.-FNRS)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Venue: Li\u00e8ge, Belgium, University of Li\u00e8ge<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Host Institute: The Department of Classical and Oriental Studies of the University of Li\u00e8ge (in collaboration with the research center in linguistics)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">No registration fee<\/span><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Workshop description<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The semantic map model is relatively new in linguistic research, but it has been intensively used during the past three decades for studying a variety of cross-linguistic and language-specific questions. The plethora of linguistic domains to which the model has been applied highlights its efficiency in capturing regular patterns of semantic structure and crosslinguistic similarities of form-meaning correspondence. One of the advantages of the model is that any type of meaning can be integrated in semantic maps, such as the meanings or functions of grammatical morphemes, of entire constructions, or of lexical items, resulting in Grammatical, Constructional, and Lexical semantic maps, respectively.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The big bulk of research has produced Grammatical and Constructional semantic maps, which represent the relationships between meanings in a wide range of domains (cf.\u00a0van der Auwera &amp; Tem\u00fcrc\u00fc, 2006: 132; Cysouw, Haspelmath, &amp; Malchukov, 2010; Narrog &amp; van der Auwera, 2011, Georgakopoulos &amp; Polis, 2018): <em>tense and aspect<\/em> (Anderson, 1982), <em>reflexives and middles<\/em> (Kemmer, 1993), <em>indefinite pronouns<\/em> (Haspelmath, 1997a), <em>impersonal constructions<\/em> (Malchukov &amp; Ogawa, 2011; Siewierska &amp; Papastathi, 2011; van der Auwera, Gast, &amp; Vanderbiesen, 2012; Gast &amp; van der Auwera, 2013), <em>modality<\/em> (van der Auwera &amp; Plungian, 1998; van der Auwera et al.,\u00a02009; Simon-Vandenberge &amp; Aijmer, 2007: ch. 10; Boye, 2010), <em>temporal markers<\/em> (Haspelmath, 1997b), <em>encoding of core arguments<\/em> (Croft, 2001: 134\u2013147), <em>semantic roles<\/em> (Luraghi, 2001; Haspelmath, 2003; Clancy, 2006; Narrog &amp; Ito, 2007; Rice &amp; Kabata, 2007; Malchukov &amp; Narrog, 2009; Nikitina, 2009; Luj\u00e1n, 2010; Malchukov, 2010; W\u00e4lchli, 2010; Grossman &amp; Polis, 2012; Hartmann, Haspelmath, &amp; Cysouw, 2014; Luraghi, 2014), <em>coordination<\/em> (Haspelmath, 2004: 20\u201324; Mauri, 2010), <em>complementation <\/em>(Matras, 2004), <em>adversatives<\/em> (Malchukov, 2004), <em>intransitive predication <\/em>(Stassen, 1997), <em>secondary predication<\/em> (van\u00a0 der Auwera &amp; Malchukov, 2005; Verkerk, 2009), <em>person-marking<\/em> (Cysouw, 2007), <em>imperative-hortatives <\/em>(van der Auwera, Dobrushina, &amp; Goussev, 2003) <em>negative existentials<\/em> (Veselinova, 2013), <em>negative polarity items<\/em> (Hoekstra, 2014), <em>intensifying particles<\/em> (Forker, 2015), <em>additives<\/em> (Forker, 2016).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In recent years, the semantic map method has experienced a \u2018Lexical turn,\u2019 the starting point of which can be traced back to Fran\u00e7ois\u2019 (2008) seminal paper, which, building on Haspelmath (2003), provides a blueprint for constructing lexical semantic maps (see also Majid et al., 2007 for an early account). Other studies that followed focused on polysemic patterns shared by diverse notions, such as quality expressions (Perrin, 2010), notions belonging to the motion domain (W\u00e4lchli &amp; Cysouw, 2012), the notion of emptiness (Rakhilina &amp; Reznikova, 2016), natural and spatial features (Youn et al., 2016; Georgakopoulos et al., 2016), temperature terms (see various articles in the volume edited by Koptjevskaja-Tamm, 2015; e.g., Perrin, 2015; Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Rakhilina, &amp; Vanhove, 2016).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Notably, most of the studies using the semantic map method has been adopting a synchronic perspective, and the limited research that has added the diachronic dimension has focused almost exclusively on the grammatical domain (Lichtenberk, 1991; van der Auwera &amp; Plungian, 1998; Narrog, 2010; Luj\u00e1n, 2010; Eckhoff, 2011; Luraghi, 2014). One can also notice that the scope of constructional maps has been expanded in order to include the diachronic dimension (Fried, 2007; 2009; Traugott, 2016). For lexical typology, on the other hand, semantic maps have been conceptualized explicitly as \u201ca strictly synchronous device,\u201d a stance justified by the complexity of the historical relations between lexical meanings (Rakhilina &amp; Reznikova, 2016: 113). Albeit complex, the historical dimension can be integrated to semantic maps, provided that there are available resources (see Zalizniak et al., 2012 for the Catalogue of Semantic Shifts that could be used in this direction).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">One major issue for the semantic map model, which is a recurrent concern in language typology as a whole, is the choice of a good language sample that will allow for valid cross-linguistic generalizations and will increase the map\u2019s accuracy. Although small-sized samples may suffice to arrive at a certain degree of generalization (Haspelmath, 2003: 217), restricting typological research to only a few languages could result in overlooking interesting (even if infrequent) connections between meanings (Narrog &amp; Ito, 2007: 276) or in missing language or culture associations that are specific to geographical regions or areas. One important future area of research for the semantic map method would then be to construct and to test various areally and genealogically stratified samples (but see Bickel, 2012). One question that will necessarily arise is whether lexical semantic maps should follow the same principle as the grammatical semantic maps. In this respect, Rakhilina and Reznikova (2016: 101\u2013102) highlight the fact that some of the restrictions of grammatical typology do not apply to lexical typology. For example, they claim that related languages can provide reliable information just as genealogically diverse ones do. Furthermore, despite the increasing availability of resources (such as the <a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"http:\/\/clics.lingpy.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Database of Cross-Linguistic Colexifications<\/em><\/a>, see List et al., 2014), the primary material for lexico-typological studies is not always sufficient, a factor that may impede large-scale studies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Besides quantity of data, the accuracy of a semantic map also depends heavily on the quality of the collected crosslinguistic material, which is best ensured by identifying comparable phenomena across languages. As to what counts as meaning, comparability is reached if the same definition is used, a definition that should ideally be purely descriptive and theory-neutral (see Fran\u00e7ois, 2008: 170; Koptjevskaja-Tamm, 2016: 5). As such, the meanings of a map can be seen as comparative concepts (Haspelmath, 2010; see the special issue of <em>Linguistic Typology <\/em>20\/2 [2016] devoted to this topic).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Another pending issue for the semantic map approach is to reach a point at which it would be possible to generate maps automatically on the basis of a given set of data (see Narrog &amp; Ito, 2007: 280), given that it is practically impossible to handle large-scale crosslinguistic datasets manually. Despite the fact that significant steps towards this goal have been taken (see, e.g., Croft &amp; Poole, 2008; Regier, Khetarpal, &amp; Majid, 2013, to name but a few), many questions remain to be explored in this highly promising domain. The problem of network inference is a very active research area (especially in biology, where network inference is used for uncovering causal relationships between genotype and phenotype) and the number of available algorithms has grown tremendously during the last decades (e.g., Siegenthaler &amp; Gunawan, 2014). Such algorithms should be tested on large-scale cross-linguistic data in order to evaluate their efficiency in plotting informative maps. Automatic plotting of semantic maps goes hand-in-hand with the availability of graph visualization platforms, which, with many built-in statistical methods, can reveal much information otherwise \u2018hidden\u2019 in the network. Visualization techniques and actual semantic analysis are and should be inseparable in the future of the semantic map model (see Malchukov, 2010: 177).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The workshop aims to foster dialogue between experts in Typology, Areal Semantics, Historical Linguistics, and Computational Linguistics. The topics that will be discussed are the following:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Methodological issues (including visualization techniques and tools).<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Semantic maps and diachrony<\/span>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">How to integrate information about diachrony (beyond oriented vectors)?<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">How to exploit synchronic material to produce meaningful inferences about diachrony?<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">How to account for contact-induced semantic changes with semantic maps?<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Lexical semantic maps<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Areal typology of lexico-semantics<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Comparison between comparative approaches relying on large databases and micro-scales studies<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Selected references<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">van der Auwera, J. (2008). In defense of classical semantic maps. <em>Theoretical Linguistics, 34<\/em>(1), 39\u201346. doi:10.1515\/thli.2008.002<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">van der Auwera, J. (2013). Semantic maps, for synchronic and diachronic typology. In A. G. Ramat, C. Mauri &amp; P. Molinelli (Eds.), <em>Synchrony and Diachrony. A dynamic interface<\/em> (pp. 153\u2013176). doi:10.1075\/slcs.133.07auw<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">van der Auwera J., &amp; Plungian, V. A. (1998). Modality\u2019s semantic map. <em>Linguistic Typology, 2<\/em>(1), 79\u2013124. doi:10.1515\/lity.1998.2.1.79<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Croft, W. (2001). <em>Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective<\/em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Croft, W., &amp; Poole, K. T. (2008). Inferring universals from grammatical variation: Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. <em>Theoretical Linguistics, 34<\/em>(1), 1\u201337. doi:10.1515\/thli.2008.001<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Cysouw, M. (2007). Building semantic maps: The case of person marking. In B. W\u00e4lchli &amp; M. Miestamo (Eds.), <em>New challenges in typology<\/em> (pp. 225\u2013248). Berlin\/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Cysouw, M., Haspelmath, M., &amp; Malchukov, A. L. (2010). Introduction to the Special Issue \u00ab\u00a0Semantic Maps: Methods and Applications\u00a0\u00bb. <em>Linguistic Discovery, 8<\/em>(1), 1\u20133. doi:10.1349\/ps1.1537-0852.a.358<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Fran\u00e7ois, A. (2008). Semantic Maps and the Typology of Colexification: Intertwining Polysemous Networks across Languages. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), <em>From Polysemy to Semantic Change. Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations<\/em> (pp. 163\u2013215). Amsterdam\/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Gast, V., &amp; van der Auwera, J. (2013). Towards a distributional typology of human impersonal pronouns, based on data from European languages. In D. Bakker &amp; M. Haspelmath (Eds.), <em>Languages Across Boundaries. Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska<\/em> (pp. 119\u2013158). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Georgakopoulos, T., Werning, A. D., Hartlieb, J., Kitazumi, T., van de Peut, E. L., Sundermeyer, A., &amp; Chantrain, G. (2016). The meaning of ancient words for \u2018earth\u2019. An exercise in visualizing colexification on a semantic map. <em>eTopoi. Journal for Ancient Studies<\/em>, <em>6<\/em>, 1\u201336.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Georgakopoulos, A. &amp; S. Polis (2018). The semantic map model. State of the art and future avenues for linguistic research. <em>Language and Linguistic Compass<\/em> 12(2), 1-33.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Grossman, E., &amp; Polis, S. (2012). Navigating polyfunctionality in the lexicon. Semantic maps and Ancient Egyptian lexical semantics. In E. Grossman, St. Polis, &amp; J. Winand (Eds.), <em>Lexical Semantics in Ancient Egyptian<\/em>, Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica 9 (pp. 175\u2013225). Hamburg: Widmaier Verlag.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Haspelmath, M. (1997a). <em>Indefinite Pronouns<\/em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Haspelmath, M. (2003). The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), <em>The New Psychology of Language<\/em>, vol. 2 (pp. 211\u2013243) New York: Erlbaum.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Haspelmath, M. (2010). Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. <em>Language,<\/em> 86(3), 663\u2013687. doi:10.1353\/lan.2010.0021<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Juvonen, P., &amp; Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (Eds.) (2016). <em>The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts<\/em>. Berlin: De Gruyter.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M, Divjak, D., &amp; Rakhilina, E. (2010). Aquamotion verbs in Slavic and Germanic: a case study in lexical typology. In V. Hasko &amp; R. Perelmutter (Eds.), <em>New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion <\/em>(pp. 315\u2013341). Amsterdam: Benjamins.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M, Rakhilina, E., &amp; Vanhove, M. (2015). The semantics of lexical typology. In N. Riemer (Ed.), <em>The Routledge Handbook of Semantics<\/em> (pp. 434\u2013454). London &amp; New York: Routledge.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">List, J.-M., Mayer, T., Terhalle, A., &amp; Urban, M. (2014). <em>CLICS: Database of Cross-Linguistic Colexifications<\/em>. Marburg: Forschungszentrum Deutscher Sprachatlas (Version 1.0, retrieved from http:\/\/CLICS.lingpy.org, accessed on 2017-7-6).<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Luraghi, S. (2014). Plotting Diachronic Semantic Maps: The Role of Metaphor. In S. Luraghi &amp; H. Narrog (Eds.), <em>Perspectives on Semantic Roles<\/em> (pp. 99\u2013150). Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi:10.1075\/tsl.106.04lur<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Malchukov, A. L. (2004). Towards a Semantic Typology of Adversative and Contrast Marking. <em>Journal of Semantics, 21<\/em>(2), 177\u2013198. doi:10.1093\/jos\/21.2.177<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Malchukov, A. L. (2010). Analyzing Semantic Maps: A Multifactorial Approach. <em>Linguistic Discovery, 8<\/em>(1), 176\u2013198. doi:10.1349\/ps1.1537-0852.a.350<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Narrog, H. (2010). A Diachronic Dimension in Maps of Case Functions. <em>Linguistic Discovery, 8<\/em>(1), 233\u2013254. doi:10.1349\/ps1.1537-0852.a.352<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Nikitina, T. (2009). Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: a study of the source\/goal ambiguity. <em>Linguistics, 47<\/em>(5), 1113\u20131141. doi:10.1515\/ling.2009.039<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Perrin, L-M. (2010). Polysemous Qualities and Universal Networks, Invariance and Diversity. <em>Linguistic Discovery, 8<\/em>(1), 259\u2013280. doi:10.1349\/ps1.1537-0852.a.353<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Rakhilina, E., &amp; Reznikova, T. (2016). A Frame-based methodology for lexical typology. In P. Juvonen &amp; M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, <em>The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts<\/em> (pp. 95\u2013129). Berlin: De Gruyter.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Regier, T., Khetarpal, N., &amp; Majid, A. (2013). Inferring semantic maps. <em>Linguistic Typology, 17<\/em>(1), 89\u2013105. doi:10.1515\/lity-2013-0003<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">W\u00e4lchli, B., &amp; Cysouw, M. (2012). Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. <em>Linguistics, 50<\/em>(3), 671\u2013710. doi:10.1515\/ling-2012-0021<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Youn, H., Sutton, L., Smith, E., Moore, C., Wilkins, J.F., Maddieson, I., Croft, W., &amp; Bhattacharya, T. (2016). On the universal structure of human lexical semantics. <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113<\/em>(7), 1766\u20131771. Retrieved from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pnas.org\/cgi\/doi\/10.1073\/pnas.1520752113\">www.pnas.org\/cgi\/doi\/10.1073\/pnas.1520752113<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zalizniak A., Bulakh M., Ganenkov D., Gruntov I., Maisak T., &amp; Russo M. (2012). The catalogue of semantic shifts as a database for lexical semantic typology. <em>Linguistics<\/em>, <em>50<\/em>(3), 633\u2013670.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><div class=\"fusion-clearfix\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-12208","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12208"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12208\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12771,"href":"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12208\/revisions\/12771"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/web.philo.ulg.ac.be\/lediasema\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}